The Alleged Conspiracy
“Broiler” chickens are the birds raised for meat — the chicken most Americans eat. In a sprawling antitrust case, buyers alleged that the largest poultry processors conspired, beginning around 2008, to fix, raise and stabilize the price of broiler chickens — for example by coordinating to limit supply (such as reducing flock sizes) and sharing sensitive production and pricing data through an industry information service. The effect, plaintiffs said, was that grocers, restaurants and ultimately consumers paid more for chicken than a competitive market would have charged.
Food-price antitrust cases like this matter because even small per-pound overcharges add up to enormous sums across a staple product bought by nearly everyone.
The Settlement
The litigation produced a series of settlements. Consumers — the “indirect purchasers” who bought chicken at stores and restaurants — won final approval of $181 million in combined settlements, including about $99 million from Tyson Foods and $76 million from Pilgrim’s Pride, plus smaller amounts from other processors. The companies did not admit wrongdoing. Separate settlements resolved claims by other groups of buyers, and some state attorneys general recovered additional money for residents. Criminal price-fixing charges the government pursued against some executives largely did not result in convictions.
So the consumer recovery came through civil settlements, even as the parallel criminal cases had mixed results.
What Consumers Should Know
Consumer antitrust settlements like this are typically distributed to eligible buyers who file claims during an open window, often for a modest amount and sometimes without needing receipts. When such settlements are announced, watch for official claim notices and deadlines, and be wary of look-alike sites. The broader takeaway is that coordinated pricing among big suppliers of everyday goods is illegal — and increasingly a target of enforcement.
Before You Act
Thinking About Filing a Claim?
Most plaintiff lawyers offer a free initial consultation and work on contingency, meaning no fee unless there is a recovery. LawsuitWatch is not a law firm: we publish explainers, and we do not provide legal advice, representation or referrals. Your state bar directory is the reliable place to find and verify a lawyer.
Broiler Chicken Price-Fixing Lawsuit: The $181 Million Settlement: Frequently Asked Questions
Answers to the most common questions about this case and your legal options.
What is the broiler chicken lawsuit about?
Buyers alleged the largest chicken processors conspired from around 2008 to fix and raise the price of broiler chickens by coordinating to limit supply and sharing pricing data, so grocers, restaurants and consumers overpaid.
How much was the chicken price-fixing settlement?
Consumers won $181 million in combined settlements, including about $99 million from Tyson and $76 million from Pilgrim's Pride, plus smaller amounts from other processors, which did not admit wrongdoing. Other buyer groups and some states settled separately.
How do consumers get paid in these cases?
Eligible buyers typically file a claim during an open window, often for a modest amount and sometimes without receipts. Watch for official claim notices and deadlines when a settlement is announced, and avoid look-alike sites.
Legal Disclaimer
This article is general legal information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Case status, eligibility criteria, and any amounts described are as reported at the date shown and may change. Consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction about your own situation.