What the Lawsuit Alleges
A class action names The Clorox Company and Burt’s Bees, alleging that certain cosmetics — lip products such as Lip Shimmer and Lip Shine, and mascaras — are marketed as clean, natural and free of “chemicals of concern” while, according to testing cited in the complaint, containing undisclosed PFAS, the “forever chemicals” linked to health and environmental concerns. The theory is economic: buyers say they paid a premium for a “natural” product that did not match the label.
The suit reports organic-fluoride readings in the tested products as a proxy for PFAS. These are allegations; the company disputes them and no court has ruled.
Why PFAS Labeling Cases Are Spreading
Burt’s Bees is one of many personal-care brands facing this same theory, because PFAS can enter cosmetics through ingredients or manufacturing and are not always disclosed. The legal pressure point is the gap between a “natural” or “clean” marketing claim and the presence of a synthetic chemical class the buyer would not expect.
Because every purchaser saw the same label, the alleged misrepresentation is common to the class, which is what makes these consumer cases workable.
What Buyers Should Know
The case is at an early stage, so there is no settlement to claim. The broader takeaway is that “natural” and “clean” are marketing terms with no fixed legal definition in cosmetics; the ingredient list, not the front-of-pack claim, is the reliable guide. For a similar PFAS theory in a drink, see our Prime Hydration PFAS lawsuit coverage.
Before You Act
Thinking About Filing a Claim?
Most plaintiff lawyers offer a free initial consultation and work on contingency, meaning no fee unless there is a recovery. LawsuitWatch is not a law firm: we publish explainers, and we do not provide legal advice, representation or referrals. Your state bar directory is the reliable place to find and verify a lawyer.
Burt's Bees Lawsuit: The PFAS 'Forever Chemicals' Claim: Frequently Asked Questions
Answers to the most common questions about this case and your legal options.
Is there a Burt's Bees settlement to claim?
No. The PFAS class action is at an early stage with no settlement or claims fund. Its allegations have not been proven.
What does the Burt's Bees lawsuit claim?
That certain lip and mascara products marketed as natural and free of 'chemicals of concern' contain undisclosed PFAS 'forever chemicals,' so buyers overpaid for a product that did not match the label.
Are "natural" and "clean" regulated terms?
Not in any fixed legal sense for cosmetics. They are marketing terms, which is why these cases focus on the actual ingredients rather than the front-label wording.
Legal Disclaimer
This article is general legal information, not legal advice, and does not create an attorney-client relationship. Case status, eligibility criteria, and any amounts described are as reported at the date shown and may change. Consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction about your own situation.