Red Bull Lawsuit: False Advertising & ‘Gives You Wings’ Settlement

The 2014 Red Bull Settlement

Red Bull's original class action settlement resolved claims that the company's extensive marketing -- taglines like 'Red Bull gives you wings,' 'improves performance,' and 'increases concentration' -- made functional claims beyond what the scientific evidence supported. Plaintiffs argued that Red Bull contained no ingredients beyond caffeine, taurine, B vitamins, and sugar that provided benefits meaningfully different from a cup of coffee, despite marketing that implied extraordinary performance enhancement.

Red Bull settled for $13 million without admitting liability. US consumers who had purchased Red Bull between January 1, 2002 and October 3, 2014 could claim a $10 cash payment or $15 in free Red Bull product. The settlement was widely covered in media, partly because it illustrated the tension between aspirational brand marketing and consumer protection law's requirement that functional claims be substantiated.

Current and Ongoing Red Bull Litigation

Litigation against Red Bull continued after the 2014 settlement on related and new theories. Subsequent lawsuits have challenged specific health and performance claims in newer marketing campaigns, ingredient labeling accuracy, and the marketing of Red Bull products to minors despite the caffeine content that health authorities have flagged as inappropriate for children and adolescents.

The American Academy of Pediatrics has stated that energy drinks are never appropriate for children and teens. Marketing and availability concerns -- Red Bull is sold in school vending machines and at youth events in some jurisdictions -- have formed the basis for consumer and regulatory challenges in multiple states. Related: Celsius energy drink false advertising settlement.

What Red Bull Actually Contains

A standard 8.4 oz Red Bull contains 80mg of caffeine -- roughly equivalent to a cup of coffee -- along with taurine, glucuronolactone, B vitamins, sucrose, and glucose. Taurine, which is an amino acid found naturally in meat and fish, was at one point falsely rumored to be derived from bull's bile (it is synthetically produced in Red Bull). The functional benefits of taurine supplementation beyond dietary intake remain scientifically contested.

The key allegation in the original lawsuit -- that Red Bull's marketing implied benefits beyond those from caffeine alone -- remains legally significant. Food and beverage companies that use performance language in marketing must be prepared to substantiate those claims under FTC guidelines if challenged.

Who Qualifies for Current Red Bull Claims

The 2014 settlement claim period has long closed. Current litigation focuses on post-2014 marketing claims and newer consumer protection theories. Consumers who purchased Red Bull based on specific performance, concentration, or health improvement claims made in advertising after 2014 may have claims in pending or future litigation depending on the specific marketing they relied upon.

For the original settlement: if you submitted a valid claim before the deadline and have not yet received payment, contact the settlement administrator to check your claim status.

Regulatory Oversight of Energy Drinks

The FDA classifies energy drinks as either dietary supplements or conventional foods depending on the manufacturer's marketing approach. Red Bull is classified as a conventional food, which subjects it to FDA food safety regulations but limits the agency's authority to regulate specific marketing claims that don't cross into drug claim territory. The FTC has primary authority over advertising substantiation claims for energy drinks.

Several states have proposed or enacted restrictions on energy drink sales to minors. The regulatory and litigation environment around energy drinks continues to evolve, and Red Bull's marketing practices remain under active scrutiny.

How to Get Legal Help

If you believe you qualify based on the eligibility criteria described above, the next step is a free consultation with an experienced attorney. Most plaintiff-side attorneys handling these cases work on contingency -- meaning you pay nothing unless your case results in a recovery. Bring any relevant documentation including receipts, correspondence, or evidence of the harm you experienced.

To stay current on case developments, claim deadlines, and settlement news, bookmark this page and subscribe to LawsuitWatch alerts. Coverage is updated as new court filings, settlement announcements, and eligibility changes are made public.