🧴 Consumer Products Updated June 2026 ✓ Active Coverage

Starbucks Coffee Lawsuit: The $50 Million Burn Verdict

A Los Angeles jury awarded $50 million to a delivery driver severely burned when a hot beverage lid failed at a Starbucks drive-through, part of a recurring complaint pattern.

Case

Garcia v. Starbucks

Verdict

$50 Million

Court

Los Angeles County

Finding

100% Liability

What Happened

In March 2025, a Los Angeles County jury awarded 50 million dollars to Michael Garcia, a delivery driver who suffered severe burns after a hot Medicine Ball tea spilled onto his lap at a Starbucks drive-through window. According to trial evidence, the lid on the beverage was not properly secured before it was handed to Garcia, and surveillance footage reportedly captured the spill as it happened.

The tea was served at a scalding temperature, and Garcia suffered catastrophic burns requiring extensive treatment. The jury found Starbucks 100 percent liable for the incident, accepting the argument that the company failed to safely hand off a dangerously hot beverage with an unsecured lid.

Part of a Recurring Complaint Pattern

This case is not an isolated incident. A separate lawsuit filed on behalf of Muriel Evans, a Los Angeles-area woman, alleges she suffered severe burns in 2022 when a cup lid popped off during a Starbucks drive-through handoff, spilling coffee served at approximately 190 degrees Fahrenheit onto her lap. That lawsuit alleges Starbucks receives roughly 80 customer complaints a month related to lids popping off, and that the company was aware of a recurring lid design issue for years without resolving it.

These cases echo the well-known 1994 lawsuit against McDonald over hot coffee burns, in which a jury also found the company liable after evidence showed the company was aware of a pattern of burn complaints tied to serving temperature. As in that earlier case, the core legal issue is not simply that a hot beverage caused a burn, but whether the company knew about a specific, recurring hazard, whether from temperature or lid design, and failed to take reasonable steps to fix it.

What This Means If You Were Injured

A large jury verdict in one case does not create an automatic right to compensation for other people burned by Starbucks beverages. Each injured person situation depends on the specific facts, including how the injury happened, the severity of the burns, and what evidence exists about the cup, lid, and handoff.

If you were burned by a spilled hot beverage at Starbucks, seeking prompt medical treatment, documenting the incident, and consulting a personal injury attorney experienced in burn and product liability claims are the practical steps, since these cases are generally pursued individually rather than as part of a class action.

How to Get Legal Help

If you were burned by a spilled hot beverage at Starbucks or another retailer due to a lid failure or excessive serving temperature, seek medical care immediately, photograph your injuries and the cup or lid involved if possible, and keep your receipt. This verdict does not automatically cover other injured customers, so a personal injury attorney experienced in burn and product liability cases can evaluate whether you have an individual claim.

To follow any further developments, bookmark this page and subscribe to LawsuitWatch alerts.

Free Legal Evaluation

Do You Qualify to File a Claim?

Our network of verified plaintiff attorneys offers free, no-obligation case evaluations. Contingency fee representation means you pay nothing unless you win.

starbucks lawsuithot beverage burnlid defectpersonal injury verdictproduct liability

Starbucks Coffee Lawsuit: The $50 Million Burn Verdict: Frequently Asked Questions

Answers to the most common questions about this case and your legal options.

What happened in the Starbucks lawsuit?

A Los Angeles County jury awarded delivery driver Michael Garcia 50 million dollars in March 2025 after he suffered severe burns when a hot tea spilled on him at a drive-through due to an unsecured lid. The jury found Starbucks 100 percent liable.

Is this the only lawsuit over Starbucks hot beverage burns?

No. A separate case involving a woman named Muriel Evans alleges a similar lid-failure burn injury in 2022 and claims Starbucks receives roughly 80 related complaints monthly, suggesting a recurring pattern rather than an isolated incident.

How is this similar to the famous McDonald hot coffee case?

Both cases centered on whether the company knew about a recurring hazard, serving temperature or lid design, and failed to address it, rather than simply on the fact that a hot beverage caused a burn.

Does the $50 million verdict apply to other injured customers?

No. That verdict applies specifically to Garcia case. Other people injured by spilled Starbucks beverages would need to pursue their own individual claims based on their specific facts, since these are not being handled as a single class action.

What should I do if I was burned by a Starbucks beverage?

Get medical treatment promptly, document your injuries, the beverage, and the cup or lid if possible, keep your receipt, and consult a personal injury attorney experienced in burn or product liability cases.