đŸ’ŗ Financial Lawsuits Updated July 2026

Interchange Fee Litigation: Card Network Rules, Merchants and Consumers

Long-running antitrust litigation concerns interchange fees set by card networks and the rules restricting how merchants can respond to them.

Category

Financial Lawsuits

Coverage

2025-2026

Last Updated

July 2026

Content Type

Legal Analysis

How Interchange Works

When a card is used, the merchant receives less than the purchase price. A portion, the interchange fee, goes to the bank that issued the card, with the rate set by the card network rather than negotiated between the merchant and that bank.

Because thousands of issuing banks all apply the network-set rate, merchants cannot negotiate individually with each. That structure is the foundation of the antitrust claims.

â„šī¸

Rewards are funded by interchange

Premium rewards cards carry higher interchange rates, which is how points and cashback are funded. That is why merchants pay more to accept them, and why rules preventing merchants from steering customers toward cheaper cards have been central to the litigation.

The claim is that networks and their member banks collectively set interchange rates, which functions as horizontal price fixing among competitors who would otherwise set their own rates.

Accompanying network rules reinforced it: honour-all-cards requirements obliging merchants accepting one card to accept all of that network cards including expensive premium ones, and anti-steering rules restricting merchants from encouraging cheaper payment methods.

Resolutions have combined monetary settlements with rule changes permitting surcharging in some circumstances and relaxing steering restrictions, though state laws and network conditions still constrain what merchants can do.

Practical Effects

Merchant acceptance costs are generally embedded in retail prices rather than charged separately, so the fee structure affects everyone including customers paying cash. That is the practical answer to who ultimately bears interchange.

Where surcharging is permitted, network rules require clear disclosure before the transaction and cap the amount. Several states restrict or prohibit it entirely, so the position varies by location.

âš ī¸

Merchant settlement claims have strict deadlines

Businesses that accepted cards during covered periods may be eligible for interchange settlement payments, but claims require processing records and are subject to firm deadlines. Many eligible merchants never file.

Free Legal Evaluation

Do You Qualify to File a Claim?

Our network of verified plaintiff attorneys offers free, no-obligation case evaluations. Contingency fee representation means you pay nothing unless you win.

visa mastercard atm lawsuit settlement Interchange Antitrust Payments

Interchange Fee Litigation: Card Network Rules, Merchants and Consumers: Frequently Asked Questions

Answers to the most common questions about this case and your legal options.

What is an interchange fee?

A portion of each card transaction paid to the issuing bank, at a rate set by the card network rather than negotiated between merchant and bank.

What is the antitrust theory?

That networks and member banks collectively set interchange, functioning as price fixing among competitors who would otherwise set their own rates.

What are honour-all-cards rules?

Requirements that a merchant accepting one card from a network must accept all of that network cards, including higher-cost premium rewards cards.

Do cash customers pay for card fees?

Effectively yes. Acceptance costs are generally embedded in retail prices rather than charged separately, so all customers bear them.

Can merchants surcharge card payments?

In some circumstances, subject to network disclosure requirements and caps, though several states restrict or prohibit surcharging entirely.

LawsuitWatch Legal Research Team

Financial Lawsuits Litigation Desk

The LawsuitWatch Legal Research Team monitors federal court PACER filings, MDL docket activity, regulatory enforcement actions, and legal settlements to deliver accurate, timely coverage of litigation affecting American consumers. Content is reviewed for factual accuracy before publication and updated as cases develop. Last reviewed: July 2026.