What Legal Malpractice Means
A lawsuit against an attorney for negligence is known as legal malpractice. It claims that a lawyer failed to provide the competent, careful representation expected of attorneys, and that the failure harmed the client. Examples include missing a filing deadline, blowing the statute of limitations, a clear conflict of interest, or a serious, avoidable error in handling a case.
Losing a case is not malpractice. Lawyers are not guarantors of results, and reasonable strategic choices that do not work out are not negligence. The claim is about a genuine departure from the standard of care, not disappointment with the outcome.
The Case Within a Case
Legal malpractice has a distinctive hurdle. To win, you generally must prove not only that the lawyer was negligent but also that the negligence actually caused you harm, which usually means showing you would have won or done better in the underlying matter but for the lawyer error. This is called the case within a case, because you essentially have to prove the original case while proving the malpractice.
That requirement makes these claims demanding. A lawyer mistake that did not change the outcome, because you would have lost anyway, typically does not support a recovery, even if the mistake was real.
What You Must Show
The standard elements are an attorney-client relationship that created a duty, a breach of the standard of care, causation linking the breach to your harm, and actual damages. Proving the standard of care and causation often requires testimony from another attorney about what a reasonably careful lawyer would have done.
Damages must be concrete, such as the value of the claim you lost or money you had to pay because of the error. Without provable harm tied to the negligence, the claim generally fails.
Deadlines and Next Steps
Legal malpractice claims carry their own statute of limitations, which varies by state and can be relatively short, sometimes measured from when you discovered or should have discovered the harm. Some states also pause the clock while the lawyer continues representing you in the same matter. These timing rules are nuanced, so prompt review matters.
If you believe a lawyer error cost you a case, gather your file, the relevant deadlines, and any correspondence, and consult a malpractice attorney. They can assess whether the case-within-a-case can be proven before the deadline runs.
How to Get Legal Help
If your situation fits what is described here, a short consultation with a lawyer who handles this type of matter is the reliable next step. Many offer a free initial review, and most injury and consumer cases are taken on contingency. Bring your documents and a written timeline.
To follow changes in the law and deadlines, bookmark this page and subscribe to LawsuitWatch alerts.
Free Legal Evaluation
Do You Qualify to File a Claim?
Our network of verified plaintiff attorneys offers free, no-obligation case evaluations. Contingency fee representation means you pay nothing unless you win.
Attorney Negligence Lawsuit: Suing a Lawyer for Legal Malpractice: Frequently Asked Questions
Answers to the most common questions about this case and your legal options.
Can I sue my lawyer for negligence?
Yes, through a legal malpractice claim, if the lawyer failed to provide competent, careful representation and that failure harmed you. Examples include missing a deadline or the statute of limitations or a serious conflict of interest.
Is losing my case enough to sue?
No. Lawyers do not guarantee results, and reasonable strategies that fail are not negligence. You must show a genuine departure from the standard of care, not just a disappointing outcome.
What is the case within a case?
The requirement that you prove the lawyer negligence actually caused harm, usually by showing you would have won or done better in the underlying matter but for the error. You essentially prove the original case while proving the malpractice.
What must I prove?
An attorney-client relationship creating a duty, a breach of the standard of care, causation linking the breach to your harm, and actual damages. Standard of care and causation often require testimony from another attorney.
How long do I have to file?
It varies by state and can be short, sometimes running from when you discovered the harm. Some states pause the clock while the lawyer keeps representing you in the same matter. Because the rules are nuanced, act promptly.